Indonesia's Tax Court is moving under the Supreme Court by 31 December 2026 — the implementing Presidential Regulation is a draft out for consultation, and dispute procedures do not change yet
Indonesia's Tax Court — where taxpayers appeal DJP assessments and refund decisions — is being moved from the Ministry of Finance to the Supreme Court. Constitutional Court Decision 26/PUU-XXI/2023 (pronounced 25 May 2023) rewrote Article 5(2) of the Tax Court Law (Law 14/2002) to read that the organisational, administrative and financial supervision of the Tax Court is carried out by the Supreme Court, implemented in phases no later than 31 December 2026. On 23 September the Ministry of Finance held a public consultation on the draft Presidential Regulation that will implement the transfer; officials target enactment in October. The message to taxpayers from the consultation is continuity: the Tax Court Law keeps governing how disputes are handled until it is revised, existing cases continue, and the transition follows "soft landing" and "hold harmless" principles so that services to the parties are not disrupted. Tax Court judges are to take Supreme Court judge status, while secretariat staff keep their finance-ministry employment while assigned to the Supreme Court for a period.
Key points
- What is moving and by when: under Constitutional Court Decision 26/PUU-XXI/2023, Article 5(2) of Law 14/2002 now reads that "organisational, administrative and financial supervision of the Tax Court is carried out by the Supreme Court, implemented in phases no later than 31 December 2026," replacing the finance ministry ("Departemen Keuangan") as the supervising body. The decision was pronounced on 25 May 2023.
- The implementing instrument: the Ministry of Finance put a draft Presidential Regulation on the transfer out for public consultation on 23 September 2026. It covers the transfer timeline and principles, judges' financial rights and status, human resources, assets and administration, governance and finance, and transitional provisions. Officials target enactment in October 2026; until then it is a draft.
- Judges and staff: Tax Court judges are to take Supreme Court judge status; secretariat staff keep their Ministry of Finance employment status while assigned to the Supreme Court for a specified period.
- What does not change for now: the Tax Court Law (Law 14/2002) continues to govern dispute handling until it is revised; procedural rules and case handling continue under the current framework; existing pending cases continue; and the rules on who may represent a taxpayer stay with the current finance-ministry regulation through the transition.
- Transition principles, as officials describe them: "soft landing" — moving from two roofs to one without disrupting services to parties in dispute — and "hold harmless" — no stakeholder, whether justice-seeker or official, should be put at a disadvantage by the reorganisation. Tax Court Deputy Secretary Bismar Fahlerie said stakeholders' "meaningful participation" is sought in designing the change.
- What we have not seen: how the Supreme Court will organise tax matters day to day, whether and when the Tax Court Law itself will be amended, or the practical date within 2026 on which each phase takes effect. The Presidential Regulation, once enacted, is the document to read.
What this means for your Indonesian entity
If your entity has a tax appeal pending, or expects to file one, nothing changes procedurally today: you file and proceed under the Tax Court Law as before, and officials have said pending cases continue and that services will not be disrupted during the move. The transfer matters over a slightly longer horizon for two reasons. First, the body responsible for the Court's organisation, administration and finances will be the Supreme Court rather than the finance ministry, whose tax authority (DJP) is the opposing party in every appeal — that is the point of the Constitutional Court ruling. Second, a 31 December 2026 deadline with the Presidential Regulation still to be issued means some administrative change — court staffing, systems, possibly forms or contacts — in the last quarter of the year. Practically: keep filing deadlines and evidence timelines exactly as they are; ask your tax adviser to watch for the Presidential Regulation in October; and if a hearing or decision date falls in December, confirm with your representative that nothing about the venue or registry has changed. We do not predict how the move will affect outcomes.
Sources
- Mahkamah Konstitusi — Putusan Nomor 26/PUU-XXI/2023, pengujian UU 14/2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak (pronounced 25 May 2023; primary source: Article 5(2) rewritten, Supreme Court, phased, no later than 31 December 2026)
- DDTCNews — Kemenkeu Gelar Konsultasi Publik Perpres Pengadilan Pajak, Ini Isinya (23 September 2026; contents of the draft Presidential Regulation, October target)
- DDTCNews — Transisi Penyatuan Atap Pengadilan Pajak, Layanan Tak Akan Terganggu (07:30 WIB, 24 September 2026; Bismar Fahlerie, Aditya Agung Priyo Nugroho, soft landing / hold harmless)
- DDTCNews — Tax Court Unification Transition Will Not Disrupt Services (24 September 2026)
- DDTCNews — Pengalihan Pengadilan Pajak ke MA Dilakukan Bertahap, Aturan Disiapkan
This page summarises publicly available information for orientation. It is not tax, legal, or accounting advice, and regulations change. Verify against the linked primary sources and contact us before acting on anything here.
Need to know how a change affects your entity?
Tell us your situation and we will tell you what actually applies to you.
Contact Us